WILPF Advocacy Documents

Syria

HRC38: Statement on the Importance of Consistent Gender Analysis in Syria

Gender-Based Violence | Human Rights
Date/month:
18 June 2018
Document type:
Statement
Body submitted to:
Human Rights Council

Sexual and gender-based violence has been a persistent issue in Syria since the uprising in 2011 and it has been used to instill fear, humiliate and punish, with grave and disproportionate impact on women and girls. The Women’s International League for Peace and Freedom welcomes the Commission of Inquiry’s report “I lost my dignity”: Sexual and gender-based violence in the Syrian Arab Republic (A/HRC/37/CRP.3) released on 15 March 2018. WILPF Secretary General Madeleine Rees and London School of Economics and Political Science Emerita Professor of International Law Christine Chinkin described the report as ground-breaking and a significant departure from previous Commission’s reports often lacking a more gender-sensitive analysis. More of their analysis can be found in a the commentary released in May 2018.

Despite the fact that the report showed consistent analysis on the profound and lasting impact of sexual and gender-based violence on those who endure it, two reports released by the Commission after this, namely the report Sieges as weapons of war: Encircle, starve, surrender, evacuate and the update on Eastern Ghouta (A/HRC/38/CRP.3), showed that a gender-sensitive approach has not been consistently applied.

In the occasion of the 38th session of the Human Rights Council, WILPF delivered a joint statement with SRI during the interactive dialogue with the Commission of Inquiry, urging the Commission to consistently apply a gender-sensitive approach to its work.

You can listen to the statement at HRC38 here (minute: 00:52:55)

UN Human Rights Council 38th session (18 June to 6 July 2018)

Item 4. Interactive Dialogue with the Commission of Inquiry on Syria

I speak on behalf of the Women’s International League for Peace and Freedom and Action Canada for Population and Development. The Sexual Rights Initiative supports this statement.

Sexual and gender-based violence has been a persistent issue in Syria since the uprising in 2011 and it has been used to instil fear, humiliate and punish, with grave and disproportionate impact on women and girls.

In March this year, the Commission of Inquiry released a report on sexual and gender-based violence. The report is ground-breaking and a significant departure from previous Commission’s reports often lacking a more gender-sensitive analysis. The report brings to the forefront the complexities of such violence in conflict-affected areas over a drawn-out period of time. In so doing, it shows that all those who are made vulnerable by the conflict and the power dynamics within it are affected by such violence, and the differential way in which they are affected. Our organisations urge Human Rights Council members and observer States to ensure that Commission’s findings and recommendations in that report be addressed fully in the resolutions and meaningful follow-up be given to them.

In this framework, we urge States to take holistic action to protect women and girls in Syria and in refugee hosting countries and to prevent the exacerbation of the ongoing violence committed against them. This should happen through addressing both individual criminal responsibility and state responsibility for the widespread violations of human rights and international humanitarian law, as well as through targeted sanctions against all perpetrators listed in the Commission of Inquiry’s report.

Despite the fact that the report on sexual and gender-based violence showed consistent analysis on the profound and lasting impact of sexual and gender-based violence on those who endure it, the two reports released afterwards, namely the ‘Sieges as weapons of war’ report and the update on Eastern Ghouta, show that a gender-sensitive approach has not been consistently applied. We urge the Commission to adopt a consistent gender-sensitive approach throughout its work, as this is a crucial element of documenting human rights violations and ensuring that the fulsome extent of those violations is captured.

WILPF Afghanistan

In response to the takeover of Afghanistan by the Taliban and its targeted attacks on civil society members, WILPF Afghanistan issued several statements calling on the international community to stand in solidarity with Afghan people and ensure that their rights be upheld, including access to aid. The Section also published 100 Untold Stories of War and Peace, a compilation of true stories that highlight the effects of war and militarisation on the region. 

IPB Congress Barcelona

WILPF Germany (+Young WILPF network), WILPF Spain and MENA Regional Representative

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Mauris facilisis luctus rhoncus. Praesent eget tellus sit amet enim consectetur condimentum et vel ante. Nulla facilisi. Suspendisse et nunc sem. Vivamus ullamcorper vestibulum neque, a interdum nisl accumsan ac. Cras ut condimentum turpis. Vestibulum ante ipsum primis in faucibus orci luctus et ultrices posuere cubilia curae; Curabitur efficitur gravida ipsum, quis ultricies erat iaculis pellentesque. Nulla congue iaculis feugiat. Suspendisse euismod congue ultricies. Sed blandit neque in libero ultricies aliquam. Donec euismod eget diam vitae vehicula. Fusce hendrerit purus leo. Aenean malesuada, ante eu aliquet mollis, diam erat suscipit eros, in.

Demilitarisation

WILPF uses feminist analysis to argue that militarisation is a counter-productive and ill-conceived response to establishing security in the world. The more society becomes militarised, the more violence and injustice are likely to grow locally and worldwide.

Sixteen states are believed to have supplied weapons to Afghanistan from 2001 to 2020 with the US supplying 74 % of weapons, followed by Russia. Much of this equipment was left behind by the US military and is being used to inflate Taliban’s arsenal. WILPF is calling for better oversight on arms movement, for compensating affected Afghan people and for an end to all militarised systems.

Militarised masculinity

Mobilising men and boys around feminist peace has been one way of deconstructing and redefining masculinities. WILPF shares a feminist analysis on the links between militarism, masculinities, peace and security. We explore opportunities for strengthening activists’ action to build equal partnerships among women and men for gender equality.

WILPF has been working on challenging the prevailing notion of masculinity based on men’s physical and social superiority to, and dominance of, women in Afghanistan. It recognizes that these notions are not representative of all Afghan men, contrary to the publicly prevailing notion.

Feminist peace​

In WILPF’s view, any process towards establishing peace that has not been partly designed by women remains deficient. Beyond bringing perspectives that encapsulate the views of half of the society and unlike the men only designed processes, women’s true and meaningful participation allows the situation to improve.

In Afghanistan, WILPF has been demanding that women occupy the front seats at the negotiating tables. The experience of the past 20 has shown that women’s presence produces more sustainable solutions when they are empowered and enabled to play a role.

Skip to content