Celebrating Feminists’ Voices, Inspiring Global Peace

Can a Movie Bring an Indictment for Crimes against Humanity? the Case of the Nobel Peace Prize-Nominated ‘No Fire Zone’

4 March 2013

The screening of the Nobel Peace Prize-nominated movie No Fire Zone by Callum Macrae at the UN premises during the Human Rights Council (HRC) sparked major international controversy over the issue of accountability of Sri Lanka ahead of the HRC. WILPF International attended the event, co-sponsored by Amnesty International, Human Rights Watch and the FIFDH, which raised a thorny question: can a movie bring an indictment for crimes against humanity?

YouTube video

Providing evidence

The film is particularly compelling because it is the first feature-length film to document the horror of civilian killings during the Sri Lankan civil war (1983 – 2009) in a way almost never done before. Mobile phone and small camera videos recorded by both victims and perpetrators are used as evidence of the war crimes. But what makes the film compelling makes it also hard to digest: no atrocity is spared to the viewer and no fiction filter is provided to make the images of massacred bodies and people screaming less horrific.

But that is precisely the intended aim of the film: showing the horror to shed hopeful light on the truth. The Channel 4 TV documentary, as a matter of fact, is the culmination of three years of journalistic investigation aimed at denouncing the shelling of an estimated 40,000 to 70,000 civilians in the first few months of 2009 by the Sri Lankan Government. The film is intended as evidence for indictment for some of the worst crimes against humanity of recent times.

The civil war through the director’s  eyes

Watching the day-to-day account of the last 138 days of the 26-year civil war between the secessionist army of the Tamil Tigers (LTTE) and the armed forces of the Sinhalese Government, the viewer find himself asking the apprehensive question ‘when will it end?’ and the even more disturbing interrogation ‘who is responsible for that?’ The war ended in 2009, but the second question is still unanswered.

The director stresses that the film is ‘no academic exercise in historical accountability’ because the men responsible for the massacre are still in charge. He hopes the film will help bring justice. Without truth-telling and without justice, he warns, ‘history is destined to repeat itself with yet more bloodshed’. That is hardly deniable, but where exactly lies the truth of what happened?

The Sri Lankan government has its own version of the facts

At the end of the screening, when the lights turned on again and we started recovering from the embarrassment of those terrible images so far away from the comfort of the UN venue where we were sitting, the ambassador of Sri Lanka rushed into the venue to read his intervention.

He decried the ‘distorted, dubious, cynical, concerted and orchestrated campaign’ aimed at casting a dark light over what his government officially call a ‘humanitarian rescue’ operation with ‘zero civilian casualties’. He added that any accusation of war crimes and crimes against humanity against the Singhalese Sri Lankan Government undermines the reconciliation process in the country. Is that true?

The UN Panel of Experts has another opinion

At the point, it was the turn of Yasmin Sooka, member of the Secretary General’s Panel of Experts on Accountability in Sri Lanka, to speak. She stated that the Sri Lankan Government cannot be trusted to investigate itself and reminded that the military court exonerated itself. This is why she called for an independent international investigation to ascertain the exact number of civilian victims and identify responsibilities.

The 2011 report Panel of Experts on Accountability in Sri Lanka mentioned credible allegations of violations of the International Humanitarian Law committed by both the government and LTTE, some of which amount for war crimes and crimes against humanity. It detailed large-scale shelling of civilians in No Fire Zones carried out by the Sri Lankan Government and the use of civilians as hostages and buffer by the LTTE. But the list of atrocities is not over: summary executions, rape, torture, internally displaced people kept in overcrowded closed camps, forced child recruitment, point-black shooting and the use of ‘white vans’ to make people disappear add to the suffering.

The day before the High Commissioner for Human Rights, Ms. Navi Pillay, during the Annual Report at Human Rights Council, had praised the 2012 report of the Internal Review Panel which concluded that there was a grave failure of the UN to adequately respond to the crisis during the last period of the civil war in Sri Lanka.

Who is accountable?

Demonstrators in Geneva asking for an independent international investigation
Demonstrators in Geneva asking for an independent international investigation on the killing of civilians during the Sri Lankan civil war

Ascertaining the responsibilities is not easy: the war was conducted in secret, as the Sri Lankan Government forced the UN and the international press to leave the war zone and silenced local media. But many share the idea that the world cannot keep looking away and that those responsible have to be prosecuted. The representative of Human Rights Watch in the venue urged the diplomats present there to respond as human beings.

At that point the venue was silent and somebody was maybe thinking about Macrae’s words: ‘without justice there can be no peace and reconciliation, and without truth there can be no justice.’ But truth discovery and justice are often a long process. Has the movie screening contributed to opening a breach into the investigation and prosecution of the responsible parties?

Only time can tell (hopefully soon).

Share the post

Your donation isn’t just a financial transaction; it’s a step toward a more compassionate and equitable world. With your support, we’re poised to achieve lasting change that echoes through generations. Thank you!

Thank you!

Melissa Torres


Prior to being elected Vice-President, Melissa Torres was the WILPF US International Board Member from 2015 to 2018. Melissa joined WILPF in 2011 when she was selected as a Delegate to the Commission on the Status of Women as part of the WILPF US’ Practicum in Advocacy Programme at the United Nations, which she later led. She holds a PhD in Social Work and is a professor and Global Health Scholar at Baylor College of Medicine and research lead at BCM Anti-Human Trafficking Program. Of Mexican descent and a native of the US/Mexico border, Melissa is mostly concerned with the protection of displaced Latinxs in the Americas. Her work includes training, research, and service provision with the American Red Cross, the National Human Trafficking Training and Technical Assistance Centre, and refugee resettlement programs in the U.S. Some of her goals as Vice-President are to highlight intersectionality and increase diversity by fostering inclusive spaces for mentorship and leadership. She also contributes to WILPF’s emerging work on the topic of displacement and migration.

Jamila Afghani


Jamila Afghani is the President of WILPF Afghanistan which she started in 2015. She is also an active member and founder of several organisations including the Noor Educational and Capacity Development Organisation (NECDO). Elected in 2018 as South Asia Regional Representative to WILPF’s International Board, WILPF benefits from Jamila’s work experience in education, migration, gender, including gender-based violence and democratic governance in post-conflict and transitional countries.

Sylvie Jacqueline Ndongmo


Sylvie Jacqueline NDONGMO is a human rights and peace leader with over 27 years experience including ten within WILPF. She has a multi-disciplinary background with a track record of multiple socio-economic development projects implemented to improve policies, practices and peace-oriented actions. Sylvie is the founder of WILPF Cameroon and was the Section’s president until 2022. She co-coordinated the African Working Group before her election as Africa Representative to WILPF’s International Board in 2018. A teacher by profession and an African Union Trainer in peace support operations, Sylvie has extensive experience advocating for the political and social rights of women in Africa and worldwide.

WILPF Afghanistan

In response to the takeover of Afghanistan by the Taliban and its targeted attacks on civil society members, WILPF Afghanistan issued several statements calling on the international community to stand in solidarity with Afghan people and ensure that their rights be upheld, including access to aid. The Section also published 100 Untold Stories of War and Peace, a compilation of true stories that highlight the effects of war and militarisation on the region. 

IPB Congress Barcelona

WILPF Germany (+Young WILPF network), WILPF Spain and MENA Regional Representative

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Mauris facilisis luctus rhoncus. Praesent eget tellus sit amet enim consectetur condimentum et vel ante. Nulla facilisi. Suspendisse et nunc sem. Vivamus ullamcorper vestibulum neque, a interdum nisl accumsan ac. Cras ut condimentum turpis. Vestibulum ante ipsum primis in faucibus orci luctus et ultrices posuere cubilia curae; Curabitur efficitur gravida ipsum, quis ultricies erat iaculis pellentesque. Nulla congue iaculis feugiat. Suspendisse euismod congue ultricies. Sed blandit neque in libero ultricies aliquam. Donec euismod eget diam vitae vehicula. Fusce hendrerit purus leo. Aenean malesuada, ante eu aliquet mollis, diam erat suscipit eros, in.


WILPF uses feminist analysis to argue that militarisation is a counter-productive and ill-conceived response to establishing security in the world. The more society becomes militarised, the more violence and injustice are likely to grow locally and worldwide.

Sixteen states are believed to have supplied weapons to Afghanistan from 2001 to 2020 with the US supplying 74 % of weapons, followed by Russia. Much of this equipment was left behind by the US military and is being used to inflate Taliban’s arsenal. WILPF is calling for better oversight on arms movement, for compensating affected Afghan people and for an end to all militarised systems.

Militarised masculinity

Mobilising men and boys around feminist peace has been one way of deconstructing and redefining masculinities. WILPF shares a feminist analysis on the links between militarism, masculinities, peace and security. We explore opportunities for strengthening activists’ action to build equal partnerships among women and men for gender equality.

WILPF has been working on challenging the prevailing notion of masculinity based on men’s physical and social superiority to, and dominance of, women in Afghanistan. It recognizes that these notions are not representative of all Afghan men, contrary to the publicly prevailing notion.

Feminist peace​

In WILPF’s view, any process towards establishing peace that has not been partly designed by women remains deficient. Beyond bringing perspectives that encapsulate the views of half of the society and unlike the men only designed processes, women’s true and meaningful participation allows the situation to improve.

In Afghanistan, WILPF has been demanding that women occupy the front seats at the negotiating tables. The experience of the past 20 has shown that women’s presence produces more sustainable solutions when they are empowered and enabled to play a role.

Skip to content