Celebrating Feminists’ Voices, Inspiring Global Peace

Informal Civil Society Forum on the Conference on Disarmament: Something Has to Change Now

27 March 2015

On 19 March, the first-ever Informal Civil Society Forum on the Conference on Disarmament (CD) was held in Geneva. Despite having recently ceased our reporting on the CD, we felt it was important to participate, as this was one of the rare opportunities where civil society gets to interact with the CD member states.

Informal interaction between states and civil society on disarmament issues

Michael Møller, Acting Secretary-General of the CD took the initiative to convene the meeting, which allowed for much needed interaction between states and civil society on the issue of disarmament and the working of the CD.

The objective of the forum was to “generate ideas and inject different perspectives into the discussions on the agenda items of the Conference through informal interaction among States and civil society representatives.” 

Møller and UN Secretary General Ban Ki-moon, who addressed the forum by video message, both emphasised the essential role civil society plays in all areas of disarmament and the need for the CD to embrace civil society. They also congratulated WILPF and its members on our 100th anniversary and contribution to “the cause of humanity”.

The forum consisted of five interactive panels comprised of representatives of CD member states and civil society. The first four panels discussed core issues of the CD: nuclear disarmament, the fissile material cut-off treaty (FMCT), negative security assurances (NSA), and the prevention of an arms race in outer space (PAROS). The fifth panel discussed the way forward for the CD and civil society.

Being SMART on nuclear disarmament

On the first panel, covering nuclear disarmament, Susi Snyder of PAX, former Secretary General of WILPF, outlined the evolution of global and national nuclear stockpile levels, and the general effect, as well as limitations of the nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty to date.

She then introduced “SMART” objectives for nuclear disarmament: Specific, Measurable, Achievable, Realistic, and Time bound, concluding with two recommendations:

  1. Be SMART, negotiate a new legal instrument that explicitly prohibits the development, production, acquisition, possession, transfer, deployment, threat of use, or use of nuclear weapons, as well as assistance, financing, encouragement, or inducement of those acts.
  2. Be BOLD, Bright Opinionated Leaders of Disarmament efforts.
Keeping outer space free from weapons
Gabriella from WILPF's Reaching Critical Will speaking on the PAROS panel
Gabriella from WILPF’s Reaching Critical Will speaking on the PAROS panel

On the fourth panel, Gabriella Irsten of WILPF’s disarmament programme Reaching Critical Will discussed key issues on the topic of prevention of an arms race in outer space (PAROS).

WILPF believes that outer space should remain free from weapons and be protected against weaponisation, militarisation, and irresponsible behaviour. It is extremely important to keep space for peace in order to facilitate humanitarian needs, such as telecommunication, disaster mitigation, resource management, and development.

Why are we failing to protect space?

The international community and traditional multilateral forums, such as the CD, have failed to achieve any tangible results in protecting space. This is largely because international discussions tend to apply the consensus rule, or the idea that all governments need to be fully on board before agreements can be made.

The limited membership in the CD is another obstacle standing in the way of progress on the space issue. The EU International Code of Conduct process has shown that there exist certain tensions between states with more advanced space programmes and emerging space actors. Therefore, it is essential that all states have a voice at the table.

Establishing priorities in space security discussions

Space security is about socioeconomic concerns and about providing essential services to people. It also has significant humanitarian implications.

It is therefore key that international organisations, such as humanitarian organisations and civil society, are included in the discussion for a more comprehensive view of what priorities the international community needs to address.

Inclusion of these actors will advance our understanding of how to deal with space security, including as a part of the larger global security environment, instead of isolated from it. Unfortunately, such exchanges are not currently taking place in the CD.

Has the CD lost perspective of human suffering and global injustice?
WILPF’s Mia Gandenberger discussing the way forward for the CD and civil society

Mia Gandenberger, also of WILPF’s disarmament programme, participated in the fifth panel, which focused on the way forward for the CD and civil society. Since its inception, WILPF has been challenging militarism, working for peace, and supporting multilateralism. However, RCW/WILPF recently decided to stop reporting on the CD.

This decision was not taken lightly, and was motivated by significant and protracted issues. The CD has failed to engage in substantive work in the last 17 years and, despite this, keeps refusing to change its working methods and rules of procedure, to increase membership, or engage civil society. This makes the conference largely disconnected from the outside world.

WILPF feels that the CD has lost perspective of the bigger picture of human suffering and global injustice. Maintaining its existing structures that reinforce deadlock and keeping it operating inside a vacuum seems to be more important for some members states than fulfilling the objective for which the CD was created: negotiating disarmament treaties.

Changing the CD or addressing disarmament issues elsewhere

There still remains much to be done in the areas of disarmament and demilitarisation, whether it be nuclear disarmament, stopping the use of explosive weapons in populated areas, preventing the development of killer robots, improving regulation of the arms trade, reducing enormous military spending, or ensuring the use of gender analysis in disarmament.

While the CD continues to fail to function as it was intended to, such issues are being and will continue to be addressed outside of it, often led by civil society.

WILPF strongly believes that progress is not possible within the CD in its current form. This leaves the international community with two options: 1) Change the CD or 2) address such issues elsewhere.

The CD’s “we do not want progress here” attitude

The Civil Society Forum showed that civil society and governments can and should have increased interaction regarding the CD’s core issues, and that it is not just possible, but more productive to do so outside of the formal CD setting.

Without civil society pressure there are very few immediate consequences for governments failing to act. Preventing civil society participation in the CD is directly saying: “we do not want progress here.”

The Forum was still quite state oriented with every panel starting with government representative reading out prepared statements and civil society representatives having to share the last minutes at the end.

Also, framing the panels in accordance with the CD’s core issues might be redundant, since the CD’s failure to work for the last 17 years is in part due to the failure of states to think creatively about whether these are the issues or approaches most conducive to progress.

Adapting the CD and the UN system to today’s reality

The CD is in need of reform, just like many other parts of the UN, e.g. the UN Security Council, which also lacks broad and equal participation, as well as the misuse of veto rights.

WILPF believes that the CD should therefore be included in the overall re-structuring of the whole UN system and adopting it to today’s threats and overall reality.

For a list of panelists attending the CD, visit Reaching Critical Will’s website.

Share the post

Your donation isn’t just a financial transaction; it’s a step toward a more compassionate and equitable world. With your support, we’re poised to achieve lasting change that echoes through generations. Thank you!

Thank you!

Melissa Torres


Prior to being elected Vice-President, Melissa Torres was the WILPF US International Board Member from 2015 to 2018. Melissa joined WILPF in 2011 when she was selected as a Delegate to the Commission on the Status of Women as part of the WILPF US’ Practicum in Advocacy Programme at the United Nations, which she later led. She holds a PhD in Social Work and is a professor and Global Health Scholar at Baylor College of Medicine and research lead at BCM Anti-Human Trafficking Program. Of Mexican descent and a native of the US/Mexico border, Melissa is mostly concerned with the protection of displaced Latinxs in the Americas. Her work includes training, research, and service provision with the American Red Cross, the National Human Trafficking Training and Technical Assistance Centre, and refugee resettlement programs in the U.S. Some of her goals as Vice-President are to highlight intersectionality and increase diversity by fostering inclusive spaces for mentorship and leadership. She also contributes to WILPF’s emerging work on the topic of displacement and migration.

Jamila Afghani


Jamila Afghani is the President of WILPF Afghanistan which she started in 2015. She is also an active member and founder of several organisations including the Noor Educational and Capacity Development Organisation (NECDO). Elected in 2018 as South Asia Regional Representative to WILPF’s International Board, WILPF benefits from Jamila’s work experience in education, migration, gender, including gender-based violence and democratic governance in post-conflict and transitional countries.

Sylvie Jacqueline Ndongmo


Sylvie Jacqueline NDONGMO is a human rights and peace leader with over 27 years experience including ten within WILPF. She has a multi-disciplinary background with a track record of multiple socio-economic development projects implemented to improve policies, practices and peace-oriented actions. Sylvie is the founder of WILPF Cameroon and was the Section’s president until 2022. She co-coordinated the African Working Group before her election as Africa Representative to WILPF’s International Board in 2018. A teacher by profession and an African Union Trainer in peace support operations, Sylvie has extensive experience advocating for the political and social rights of women in Africa and worldwide.

WILPF Afghanistan

In response to the takeover of Afghanistan by the Taliban and its targeted attacks on civil society members, WILPF Afghanistan issued several statements calling on the international community to stand in solidarity with Afghan people and ensure that their rights be upheld, including access to aid. The Section also published 100 Untold Stories of War and Peace, a compilation of true stories that highlight the effects of war and militarisation on the region. 

IPB Congress Barcelona

WILPF Germany (+Young WILPF network), WILPF Spain and MENA Regional Representative

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Mauris facilisis luctus rhoncus. Praesent eget tellus sit amet enim consectetur condimentum et vel ante. Nulla facilisi. Suspendisse et nunc sem. Vivamus ullamcorper vestibulum neque, a interdum nisl accumsan ac. Cras ut condimentum turpis. Vestibulum ante ipsum primis in faucibus orci luctus et ultrices posuere cubilia curae; Curabitur efficitur gravida ipsum, quis ultricies erat iaculis pellentesque. Nulla congue iaculis feugiat. Suspendisse euismod congue ultricies. Sed blandit neque in libero ultricies aliquam. Donec euismod eget diam vitae vehicula. Fusce hendrerit purus leo. Aenean malesuada, ante eu aliquet mollis, diam erat suscipit eros, in.


WILPF uses feminist analysis to argue that militarisation is a counter-productive and ill-conceived response to establishing security in the world. The more society becomes militarised, the more violence and injustice are likely to grow locally and worldwide.

Sixteen states are believed to have supplied weapons to Afghanistan from 2001 to 2020 with the US supplying 74 % of weapons, followed by Russia. Much of this equipment was left behind by the US military and is being used to inflate Taliban’s arsenal. WILPF is calling for better oversight on arms movement, for compensating affected Afghan people and for an end to all militarised systems.

Militarised masculinity

Mobilising men and boys around feminist peace has been one way of deconstructing and redefining masculinities. WILPF shares a feminist analysis on the links between militarism, masculinities, peace and security. We explore opportunities for strengthening activists’ action to build equal partnerships among women and men for gender equality.

WILPF has been working on challenging the prevailing notion of masculinity based on men’s physical and social superiority to, and dominance of, women in Afghanistan. It recognizes that these notions are not representative of all Afghan men, contrary to the publicly prevailing notion.

Feminist peace​

In WILPF’s view, any process towards establishing peace that has not been partly designed by women remains deficient. Beyond bringing perspectives that encapsulate the views of half of the society and unlike the men only designed processes, women’s true and meaningful participation allows the situation to improve.

In Afghanistan, WILPF has been demanding that women occupy the front seats at the negotiating tables. The experience of the past 20 has shown that women’s presence produces more sustainable solutions when they are empowered and enabled to play a role.

Skip to content