Latest News

Outer Space Security: Same Old, Same Old?

28 August 2015

On 24-25 August, WILPF attended the yearly conference on space security organised by the United Nations Institute for Disarmament Research (UNIDIR). The title selected for this year’s event was ‘Underpinning Foundations of Space Security.’ Throughout the various panels of the conference the international efforts on achieving some common understanding and taking concerted actions on space security, and the related challenges, were discussed. This article presents an overview of the main themes and problems tackled during the event.Unidir Outer Space Conference 2015

The Risks in Outer Space: Closer Than We Think

As Mr Jarmo Sareva, Director of UNIDIR, reminded us—given everyone’s increasing dependence on the space domain—any disruptions in the space realm can have very terrestrial consequences. In the last decades space has become an increasingly congested environment. With the increasing number of both military and civilian actors in outer space, Ambassador Venkatesh Varma, Permanent Representative of the Permanent Mission of India to the Conference on Disarmament, pointed at the fact that we are currently facing the risk of not having enough legal instruments regulating space. As it is notorious, in fact, the process of instituting legal instruments regulating outer space has slowed down considerably. In other words, there is an increasingly risky mismatch between the increasing number of activities led in outer space and the legislation regulating them.

Avoiding ‘Star Wars’: the Current International Efforts

The Outer Space Treaty (OST), the most important treaty in providing regulations on the activities in outer space, dates back to 1967. As far as weaponisation of outer space is concerned, the OST in its article IV prohibits to ‘‘place in orbit […] objects carrying nuclear weapons or any kinds of weapons of mass destruction.’’ However, as Mr Alexander Deyneko, Deputy Permanent Representative of the Permanent Mission of the Russian Federation in Geneva noted, the OST left many gaps to be filled and the risk for an increasing highly militarised arena is a real and growing one.

The most notable current efforts of the international community in tackling this serious issue include the creation of the Russia and China sponsored Treaty on the Prevention of Placement of Weapons in Outer Space and of the Threat or Use of Force Against Outer Space Objects (PPWT) and of an International Code of Conduct for Outer Space Activities (ICOC) proposed by the European Union (EU). Some complications inherent to these documents include the desire of many states to bring the talks on the ICOC under the mandate of the UN, as well as the criticisms that the PPWT does not include a verification mechanism, which might have negative consequences on its effectiveness. Moreover, China’s insistence on bringing the discussion related to PPWT under the aegis of the Conference on Disarmament (CD) might have counterproductive results given the lack of effective action of the conference in the last decade.

A Common Understanding of Outer Space?

What resulted as most evident from the various panels at the conference is that a clear understanding of some crucial issues related to space security is still missing.

To begin with, there is a lack of consensus in the international community on whether it is necessary to provide a clear definition of what constitutes a weapon in space. For example, there is a lack of definition of what constitutes a weapon in the PPWT, even though Ambassador FU Cong, Deputy Permanent Representative (Disarmament) at the Permanent Mission of the People’s Republic of China to the United Nations in Geneva, conceded that it could be included in case that the international community finds a common understanding of it. However, this seems a very unlikely possibility for, as Ambassador (Retired) Paul Meyer, Senior Fellow in Space Security and Nuclear Disarmament, The Simons Foundation, pointed out, we have been witnessing a ‘stagnant diplomacy’ concerning security issues.

Moreover, the very understanding of ‘peaceful use of space’ is contested, dividing states. Mr André Joao Rypl, from the Office of Outer Space, Ocean and Antarctic Affairs of the Brazilian Ministry of External Relations, pointed that some states consider the ‘peaceful purposes’ of outer space, enshrined in article IV of the OST, as the total prohibition of military activities. Other states consider them as the prohibitions of weaponisation of outer space and, finally, some other states consider peaceful purposes as the not aggressive or hostile use of outer space. If there is not a common understanding of peaceful purposes, the possibility of incurring into conflict, or ‘star wars’, cannot be ruled out.

We should not also underestimate the fact that there is a lack of agreement on the so called ‘right to self-defence’, enshrined in article 51 of the UN Charter, applied to outer space. For example, the PPWT does not hinder the right of self-defence of countries. However, it could be questioned how this would be applied to outer space and what would constitute as an attack worth of responding, when consensus on the right of self-defence on earth is still debated.

A Galaxy of Challenges

Overall, the event has provided many points of reflections on the state of advancement of international efforts in regulating space activities. However, during the different panels it emerged that the challenges ahead are still numerous and more international efforts in reaching common solutions are needed.

What Do You Think of Security In Outer Space?

Speak Up and Comment Using the Comment Field Below.


Share the post

Your donation isn’t just a financial transaction; it’s a step toward a more compassionate and equitable world. With your support, we’re poised to achieve lasting change that echoes through generations. Thank you!

Thank you!

Melissa Torres


Prior to being elected Vice-President, Melissa Torres was the WILPF US International Board Member from 2015 to 2018. Melissa joined WILPF in 2011 when she was selected as a Delegate to the Commission on the Status of Women as part of the WILPF US’ Practicum in Advocacy Programme at the United Nations, which she later led. She holds a PhD in Social Work and is a professor and Global Health Scholar at Baylor College of Medicine and research lead at BCM Anti-Human Trafficking Program. Of Mexican descent and a native of the US/Mexico border, Melissa is mostly concerned with the protection of displaced Latinxs in the Americas. Her work includes training, research, and service provision with the American Red Cross, the National Human Trafficking Training and Technical Assistance Centre, and refugee resettlement programs in the U.S. Some of her goals as Vice-President are to highlight intersectionality and increase diversity by fostering inclusive spaces for mentorship and leadership. She also contributes to WILPF’s emerging work on the topic of displacement and migration.

Jamila Afghani


Jamila Afghani is the President of WILPF Afghanistan which she started in 2015. She is also an active member and founder of several organisations including the Noor Educational and Capacity Development Organisation (NECDO). Elected in 2018 as South Asia Regional Representative to WILPF’s International Board, WILPF benefits from Jamila’s work experience in education, migration, gender, including gender-based violence and democratic governance in post-conflict and transitional countries.

Sylvie Jacqueline Ndongmo


Sylvie Jacqueline NDONGMO is a human rights and peace leader with over 27 years experience including ten within WILPF. She has a multi-disciplinary background with a track record of multiple socio-economic development projects implemented to improve policies, practices and peace-oriented actions. Sylvie is the founder of WILPF Cameroon and was the Section’s president until 2022. She co-coordinated the African Working Group before her election as Africa Representative to WILPF’s International Board in 2018. A teacher by profession and an African Union Trainer in peace support operations, Sylvie has extensive experience advocating for the political and social rights of women in Africa and worldwide.

WILPF Afghanistan

In response to the takeover of Afghanistan by the Taliban and its targeted attacks on civil society members, WILPF Afghanistan issued several statements calling on the international community to stand in solidarity with Afghan people and ensure that their rights be upheld, including access to aid. The Section also published 100 Untold Stories of War and Peace, a compilation of true stories that highlight the effects of war and militarisation on the region. 

IPB Congress Barcelona

WILPF Germany (+Young WILPF network), WILPF Spain and MENA Regional Representative

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Mauris facilisis luctus rhoncus. Praesent eget tellus sit amet enim consectetur condimentum et vel ante. Nulla facilisi. Suspendisse et nunc sem. Vivamus ullamcorper vestibulum neque, a interdum nisl accumsan ac. Cras ut condimentum turpis. Vestibulum ante ipsum primis in faucibus orci luctus et ultrices posuere cubilia curae; Curabitur efficitur gravida ipsum, quis ultricies erat iaculis pellentesque. Nulla congue iaculis feugiat. Suspendisse euismod congue ultricies. Sed blandit neque in libero ultricies aliquam. Donec euismod eget diam vitae vehicula. Fusce hendrerit purus leo. Aenean malesuada, ante eu aliquet mollis, diam erat suscipit eros, in.


WILPF uses feminist analysis to argue that militarisation is a counter-productive and ill-conceived response to establishing security in the world. The more society becomes militarised, the more violence and injustice are likely to grow locally and worldwide.

Sixteen states are believed to have supplied weapons to Afghanistan from 2001 to 2020 with the US supplying 74 % of weapons, followed by Russia. Much of this equipment was left behind by the US military and is being used to inflate Taliban’s arsenal. WILPF is calling for better oversight on arms movement, for compensating affected Afghan people and for an end to all militarised systems.

Militarised masculinity

Mobilising men and boys around feminist peace has been one way of deconstructing and redefining masculinities. WILPF shares a feminist analysis on the links between militarism, masculinities, peace and security. We explore opportunities for strengthening activists’ action to build equal partnerships among women and men for gender equality.

WILPF has been working on challenging the prevailing notion of masculinity based on men’s physical and social superiority to, and dominance of, women in Afghanistan. It recognizes that these notions are not representative of all Afghan men, contrary to the publicly prevailing notion.

Feminist peace​

In WILPF’s view, any process towards establishing peace that has not been partly designed by women remains deficient. Beyond bringing perspectives that encapsulate the views of half of the society and unlike the men only designed processes, women’s true and meaningful participation allows the situation to improve.

In Afghanistan, WILPF has been demanding that women occupy the front seats at the negotiating tables. The experience of the past 20 has shown that women’s presence produces more sustainable solutions when they are empowered and enabled to play a role.

Skip to content